PART 9: WHY IS THE COUNTY ATTORNEY VIOLATING MY RIGHTS & MISREPRESENTING  WHAT HAPPENED? IS HE BREAKING LAWS TO TRY YO UNLAWFULLY WIN A CONVICTION? DOES THE MCAO SUPPORT HIS ACTIONS?

QUESTIONS FOR THE COUNTY ATTORNEY:

1.WHY IS THE COUNTY ATTORNEY USING 2 WITNESSES WHO ARE FORMER COPS WITH  BRADY VIOLATIONS?

2.WHY DOES THE PROSECUTOR KEEP IMPLYING THE NURSE AND I WERE IN A PRIVATE ROOM WITHOUT WITNESSES? WE WERE IN A BIG OPEN AREA WITH 15-20 WITNESSES.

3.WHEN & HOW DID HE LEARN THE ONLY EVIDENCE THEY HAD WAS GONE?

4.WHERE IS THE CUSTODY OF RECORD FOR THE SECURITY TAPE? WHO HAD THE SECURITY TAPE OF THE INCIDENT  LAST?

5. DOES THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WORK WITH DIRTY COPS BECAUSE HES INVOLVED IN THE MEDICAID FRAUD OPERATION?

6.WHY DID THE COUNTY ATTORNEY FAIL TO DISCLOSE (TO THE DEFENSE) THAT POLICEMAN #1 IS ON THE PHOENIX BRADY LIST? WHEN WILL HE BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE?

Through this process, I started to wonder if COUNTY ATTORNEY David Foster had a history of breaking laws to win convictions. I don’t know if he’s ever been punished for the things he’s been accused of here (presenting false &/or misleading information, lying about what happened to the video evidence & conspiring with the Phoenix police), but he used the same tactics against me in TRIAL #1. (SEE BELOW)

Are COUNTY ATTORNEYS willing to use Brady list officers as witnesses  (without disclosing it to the defense) to win a conviction CONSIDERED CORRUPT?

I’m not the only one that has witnessed DAVID FOSTER being unethical in order to win a case.  This victim also claims David Foster manipulated & distorted testimony & evidence. DAVID FOSTER  has also previously been accused of illegally conspiring with the PHOENIX POLICE. Foster’s previous victim says Foster relied on false testimony from police officers that didn’t witness the event. He has a history of hiding evidence & lying in court & misrepresenting facts &the defendant.

In this web article, a former defendant shares how Mr Foster used FALSE CLAIMS & misleading information to try to get an indictment. The author says Mr Foster knowingly presented false & misleading information.

WHY IS SO MUCH CORRUPTION BEING OVERLOOKED? . WHY ISN’T ANYONE HOLDING THE COUNTY ATTORNEY & THE MCAO  ACCOUNTABLE?

WHY ISN’T THE MARICOPA ATTORNEYS OFFICE (MCAO) HOLDING THEIR COUNTY ATTORNEYS ACCOUNTABLE?

Q:DOES THE MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEYS OFFICE (MCAO)HAVE A HISTORY OF MISCONDUCT?

A: YES

When I did research on the COUNTY ATTORNEY , I found out that DAVID FOSTER and the MARICOPA county attorney’s office (MCAO) have faced criminal allegations from others before me.

IT TURNS OUT THE WOMAN THAT RUNS MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE….          RACHEL MILLER….,HAS ALSO BEEN ACCUSED OF USING SIMILAR ILLEGAL TACTICS AS DAVID FOSTER (LIKE ETHICAL MISCONDUCT, &WITHOLDING VIDEO EVIDENCE, & MAKJNG FALSE STATEMENTS) TO TRY TO UNLAWFULLY WIN AN INDICTMENT.

“A bar complaint was filed against Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell in late 2022 by defense attorneys for Nubia Rodriguez, alleging ethical misconduct regarding the withholding of video evidence, false statements, and faulty data in a negligent homicide case. The 46-page complaint alleged Mitchell failed to supervise her staff and supported a prosecution that hid exculpatory evidence” (GOOGLE AI)

THE MCAO IS FULL OF CONTROVERSY.

THE MARICOPA CORRUPTION PROBLEM IS SYSTEMIC.

• Controversy: The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office (MCAO) has faced scrutiny regarding the use of the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database to investigate potential jurors in high-profile cases, such as in the YouTube video regarding MCAO. 

Maricopa County Superior Court (.gov) +5

In late 2025, a Maricopa County Superior Court judge ordered the MCAO to explain its use of the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database to conduct criminal background checks on potential jurors. 

Legal Risk: Unauthorized use of the NCIC database for non-criminal justice purposes (like jury vetting) is a Class 6 felony under Arizona law.

Department of Justice (DOJ) Scrutiny: An August 2024 DOJ report cited the MCAO for its role in a scandal where police and prosecutors allegedly “invented” a gang to falsely charge protesters. The report linked these actions to broader civil rights violations within the Phoenix Police Department. 

Q:If the COUNTY ATTORNEY  is willing to use a Phoenix Brady list  POLICE  OFFICER as a witness in court without disclosing it, was TRIAL #1 A FAIR TRIAL?  

A: NO. The COUNTY  ATTORNEY went through a whole trial, without disclosing this to us. He should be disciplined.

IF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY  HAS NO EVIDENCE & NO TRUSTWORTHY EYEWITNESSES WERE INTERVIEWED, WHY CANT I GET THIS CASE DISMISSED?

Q: WHY ARE  BARROWS & THE COUNTY ATTORNEY BREAKING LAWS TO GET AN UNLAWFUL CONVICTION

A:. THEY THINK THEY’RE ABOVE THE LAW. THE CORRUPTION IS SYSTEMIC.

The MARICOPA legal system is broken. It’s not just a few broken spokes. It’s let’s shut it down & start over broken. They county attorneys working in the MCAO think it’s fine to break laws to convict  people that haven’t broken any laws. This incident  happened over  a year and a half ago & I’m still fighting this false allegation. They have no evidence & no eye witnesses (except for me & the security guard that made up the false allegation).

HERE’S EVIDENCE THE COUNTY ATTORNEY DOES NOT HAVE ANY EYEWITNESSES…

YES	ME-I saw everything
YES but he lies	SECURITY GUARD #1- He made the false allegation & grabbed me
NO	HEAD NURSE- No. She had her back turned when security guard#1 used excessive force to stop me from leaving
NO	SECURITY GUARD #2- He proves he didn’t see the incident but lies & says otherwise (See below)
NO	SECURITY GUARD #3- admits he wasn’t in the room when the incident happened
YES	Student nurse- (NEVER INTERVIEWED)
YES	Other nurses in the room: (NEVER INTERVIEWED)
YES	Other Medicaid pain patients (10-15): (NEVER INTERVIEWED)

SECURITY  GUARD #3 admits he wasn’t in the room when THE INCIDENT happened.

In the police investigation, the police  interviewed no actual eyewitnesses except for me & the man that made the false allegation & assaulted me. The nurse says she didn’t see what happened bc she was facing away from us. She has said several times that she didn’t know she had been hit until her officer told her she had been punched…twice!  She said this in the police report & on the stand but it’s an obvious lie. Punches & shoves feel very different.  The nurse admits she had her back to me when SECURITY GUARD #1  took me to the ground. The reason she didn’t see hear or feel anything is bc nothing happened to her.

She never saw me walk to the security guard, where I was stopped & was assaulted. She didn’t see what actually happened bc she was never facing me. The security guards say they had to get between us to take me down. That’s also a lie. They claim I hit her in the back. Then, they got between us to take me down. More lies. The security guards never got between me & the head nurse bc I never even went to the far side of the room. She was never close enough to me for me to touch her. The only physical contact that took place was between me & SECURITY GUARD #1, and he was the instigator. He never should’ve touched me. He touched me with the intent to hurt me, and he was successful.

SECURITY GUARD #2 doesn’t qualify as an”eyewitness”. He says he saw the incident, but his story doesn’t make  sense. He wasn’t in the immediate area & it happened very fast. Security guard #1 had me on my back on the floor in seconds. SECURITY GUARD #2 was not in a position to see what happened between SECURITY  GUARD  #1 & I.

In his interviews, SECURITY GUARD #2 reveals he’s lying when he  can’t recall basic details bc he wasn’t an actual eyewitness. Right after it happened, the police interviewed SECURITY GUARD #2 & he couldn’t remember how or where I allegedly hit her. .In the police report, he says he was in the room but doesn’t remember if I punched her in the front or back. 

WHAT?

If I actually touched her  & he saw it. Then, he would know where I hit her & which way our bodies were facing if we were fighting. He proved that he was not an actual eyewitness when he says that he didn’t know if I hit her in the front or the back, but he knows I hit her. He has no mental image of it bc it didn’t happen. 

I’M SORRY… WHAT?

I THINK NO EVIDENCE & NO EYEWITNESSES SHOULD EQUAL NO CASE & NO TRIAL #2!